Electronic Security Tags and Their Applications in Various Industries

Electronic security tags have become a vital tool in various industries to prevent theft and inventory loss. They're small, discreet, and can be attached to merchandise or equipment.

In retail, electronic security tags are used to prevent shoplifting by triggering alarms when someone tries to leave the store with tagged items. This has resulted in a significant reduction in theft and inventory loss for many retailers.

Electronic security tags are also used in healthcare to track and manage medical equipment and supplies. This helps hospitals and clinics keep track of their inventory and prevent theft or loss of expensive equipment.

The use of electronic security tags in industries has led to a significant reduction in inventory loss and theft, resulting in cost savings and improved efficiency.

Here's an interesting read: Canada to Increase Border Security following Tariff Threats from Trump

Electronic security tags come in various types, each designed to serve a specific purpose.

RFID tags are a popular choice for loss prevention in retail settings, using radio waves to transmit data to a reader.

Passive RFID tags have no power source, relying on the reader to activate them, while active tags have a built-in battery for continuous transmission.

Acoustic tags use sound waves to detect and track movement, often used in high-security applications.

Electronic article surveillance (EAS) tags are designed to be easily detectable by EAS systems, typically used in retail stores to prevent shoplifting.

Electronic security tags can be equipped with a built-in alarm that sounds when the tag detects tampering or unauthorized removal from the store.

These alarms not only trigger the store's electronic article surveillance system but also sound a local alarm attached to the merchandise, continuing to sound for several minutes after leaving the store.

Disposable tags are incredibly affordable, costing just a matter of cents, and may have been embedded during manufacture.

More sophisticated systems are available, which are more difficult to circumvent, and tend to be product category specific, such as for high-value electronics and consumables.

Reusable security solutions, like "Safers" and "Spiders", completely enclose the article to be protected and require specific detachers or electronic keys at the point-of-sale desk.

Security tags can be vulnerable to interference from various sources, including metal detectors and other electronic devices.

The use of security tags with metal components can trigger false alarms in metal detectors, leading to inconvenience and potential delays.

However, some security tags are designed to be resistant to metal detector interference, making them a more reliable choice for certain applications.

Shielding is a common technique used to evade security tags. Most systems can be circumvented by placing tagged goods in a bag lined with aluminum foil.

The booster bag acts as a Faraday cage, shielding the tags from the antennas. Some vendors claim their acousto-magnetic systems are immune to this method, but a sufficient amount of shielding can defeat standard systems.

30 layers of standard 20 μm foil are enough to defeat all standard systems. The amount of shielding required depends on the system's sensitivity and the distance and orientation of the tags relative to its antennas.

Low-frequency magnetic systems require more shielding than radio-frequency systems due to near-field magnetic coupling. Magnetic shielding with steel or mu-metal is more effective, but also cumbersome and expensive.

The shielding technique is well known amongst shoplifters and store owners. Some countries have specific laws against it, which can raise shoplifting from a misdemeanor to a felony status if a "burglary tool" is involved.

Jamming is a significant concern for EAS systems, as it can render them inoperative by disrupting the transmission of electromagnetic signals.

Shoplifters can easily build crude transmitters to jam signals, as they require little power and can be made with minimal expertise.

However, high-frequency EAS systems are less likely to be jammed due to the difficulty of building a jammer for microwave circuits.

A simple firmware upgrade can be effective in detecting jamming in modern DSP-based EAS systems.

The vast majority of EAS systems do not currently detect jamming, leaving them vulnerable to interference.

Interference and health issues are a real concern with electronic article surveillance systems. They emit electromagnetic energy that can interfere with electronics.

All types of EAS systems can cause problems, but some are worse than others. Magneto-harmonic systems, for instance, need to create strong magnetic fields to work, which can interfere with CRT displays.

Acousto-magnetic systems use less power, but their signals are still strong enough to cause issues. They're pulsed at a frequency of 100 Hz, which can be a problem for some people.

Radio-frequency systems, on the other hand, are the least interfering. They operate at a lower power and frequency, making it easier to shield against them.

There have been reported cases of EAS systems causing health issues. A study by the Mayo Clinic in 2007 found that acousto-magnetic EAS systems could cause pacemakers to fail and defibrillators to trigger.

Some installations may be intentionally reconfigured to exceed the manufacturer's specifications, which can lead to higher magnetic field levels. This is a serious concern that needs to be addressed.

Tag pollution is a significant problem caused by non-deactivated tags carried around by customers. It decreases the effectiveness and integrity of the EAS system.

Stores with EAS systems can't deactivate non-system tags, so they only deactivate their own system's tags. Stores without EAS systems don't deactivate any tags at all.

This is why people often trigger alarms entering a store, causing frustration for customers and staff. It's a frustrating experience for everyone involved.

The lack of standardization in tag deactivation is a major contributor to tag pollution. It's a challenge that retailers face every day.

Here are some reasons why tag pollution is a problem:

Tag pollution highlights the need for a more efficient and standardized approach to tag deactivation. It's an issue that retailers need to address to maintain the integrity of their EAS systems.

Security tags are a powerful deterrent against theft, and their visible presence on merchandise sends a clear message to potential shoplifters that the items are protected. This discourages theft attempts, reducing the risk of loss and shrinkage.

EAS security tags are designed to trigger alarms when they pass through the store's exit without proper deactivation or removal, notifying store staff of potential theft incidents in real time. This allows them to respond promptly and apprehend thieves.

The benefits of EAS security tags extend beyond theft prevention, as they also streamline the inventory management process and enhance operational efficiency. These anti-theft tags can be quickly attached to merchandise during the tagging process and easily removed or deactivated at the point of sale.

Reusable EAS security tags, like those offered by Novatron, provide a cost-effective and sustainable solution for merchandise protection. These durable and reusable tags can be deployed multiple times, minimizing environmental impact and reducing the need for constant tag replacements.

Some common types of security tags include:

Security tags are a powerful deterrent against theft in retail environments, sending a clear message to potential shoplifters that the items are protected.

The visible presence of anti-theft security tags on merchandise discourages theft attempts, reducing the risk of loss and shrinkage. This is especially true for high-volume, high-shrinkage items such as garments, health and beauty products, and home entertainment products.

EAS security tags can be quickly attached to merchandise during the tagging process and easily removed or deactivated at the point of sale. This streamlines the inventory management process and enhances operational efficiency.

Reusable EAS security tags, like those offered by Novatron, provide a cost-effective and sustainable solution for merchandise protection. These tags are designed for multiple deployments, allowing retailers to efficiently safeguard their inventory without the need for constant tag replacements.

EAS tags work in conjunction with a transmitter/receiver system, which provides an ideal solution for retail loss prevention. When a tag is triggered, it sets off an alarm, alerting store staff of potential theft incidents in real time.

Some common types of security tags include:

EAS tags have proven to be an effective deterrent to would-be thieves, and as a very audible alert if an actual theft attempt plays out.

Electronic security tags have become a common sight on retail products, particularly clothing, electronics, CDs, DVDs, and video games. Retailers have found them to be an effective deterrent against shoplifting.

Security tags are now available in a wide range of sizes, making them accessible to food, grocery, and cosmetics retailers. This has expanded their use beyond traditional retail settings.

Discrete and integrated tags have replaced bulky and cumbersome ones, making them easier to apply and remove. This design evolution has further increased their effectiveness as a deterrent.

Source tagging is most commonly used to detect and prevent the theft of retail merchandise. This method has proven to be a valuable tool in preventing shoplifting.

Tags can also be used to guard against the removal of private or public property, such as university media or library books. These tags are created using RFID technology.

Security tags can be easily deployed on a wide range of items, from clothing and accessories to electronics and luggage.

The most common method of deployment is through a simple adhesive strip, which can be applied quickly and discreetly.

Electronic security tags can be powered by a small battery that lasts for several years, reducing the need for frequent replacements.

Some security tags can be programmed to only activate when they are removed from the item, making it easier to manage inventory and prevent theft.

Security tag management systems can be integrated with existing inventory management systems to streamline processes and reduce costs.

The cost of deploying and managing electronic security tags can be offset by the reduction in inventory losses and improved customer satisfaction.

Source tagging, which involves attaching security tags at the point of manufacture, didn't become widely adopted until the early 1990s. This was after years of development and negotiations between retailers, manufacturers, and EAS vendors.

EAS tags contain sensors that communicate with store Electronic Article Surveillance systems to detect theft. The specific functionality of EAS tags depends on the type of surveillance system used.

Acousto-Magnetic (AM) tags provide an extended range for sensor detection and are more resistant to interference from other electronics. They're usually thick and three-dimensional, making them suitable for high-value items like power tools and equipment.

Radio Frequency (RF) tags are the most common choice for retailers due to their lower price point and flexible application options.

Magnetic tags can be deactivated by magnetization, while magneto-acoustic tags require demagnetization.

Sticking a powerful magnet on disposable magnetic tags will bias them and prevent resonance in magneto-acoustic tags.

A strong magnet is needed to demagnetize non-disposable magneto-acoustic tags since the strips are inside the casing and further away.

Sticking a piece of metal, such as a large coin, on a disposable radio-frequency tag will shield it.

Non-disposable radio-frequency tags require stronger magnets or pieces of metal to disable or shield since the strips are inside the casing and further away.

Deactivation of magnetic tags is straightforward, but demagnetization of magneto-acoustic tags requires a bit more effort.

A deactivation pad is typically used to deactivate 8.2 MHz label tags, but it can also be done by punching a hole or covering the circuit with a metallic label.

Tag orientation plays a crucial role in the detection rate of security tags, and it's not just about placing them anywhere.

Except for microwave tags, detection rates depend on the orientation of the tag relative to the detection loops.

Magnetic field lines from a pair of planar loops forming a Helmholtz coil are approximately parallel in their center, so orienting the tag to avoid magnetic flux from the coils can prevent detection.

This is a known shortcoming, first documented in early EAS patents, and it can be solved by using multiple coils or arranging them in a figure-of-eight configuration.

Even with these solutions, sensitivity will still be orientation-dependent, but detection will be possible at all orientations.

Security tags can be vulnerable to hacking, allowing thieves to disable them and steal merchandise.

Electronic security tags require a power source, which can be a battery or a wire connection, making them prone to power drain or tampering.

Some security tags use radio frequency identification (RFID) technology, which can be disrupted by strong magnetic fields or other electronic devices.

Theft can be committed by employees or store staff, who may use their knowledge of the security system to disable or remove tags.

Electronic security tags have been widely used in retail and other industries to prevent shoplifting and inventory loss. They can be easily removed or tampered with, making them less effective than other security measures.

One alternative to electronic security tags is RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) technology. RFID tags can be embedded in merchandise and can be read by a reader without physical contact.

RFID tags have a longer range than electronic security tags and can be more difficult to remove. They also provide a more accurate inventory count and can be integrated with other security systems.

Another alternative is GPS tracking, which can be used to track high-value items or merchandise in transit. GPS tracking can provide real-time location data and can be used to monitor the movement of items.

GPS tracking can be more expensive than RFID technology, but it offers a higher level of security and can be used to track items in remote areas. It also provides a clear audit trail of item movement.

Some businesses also use smart labels, which can be programmed to alert staff if an item is removed from a shelf or if an item is not returned to its original location. Smart labels can be more effective than traditional security tags and can be used to monitor inventory levels in real-time.